this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
111 points (98.3% liked)

Shirts That Go Hard

6069 readers
2 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2

Community Rules

1) Be nice and have fun.

Site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them.

2) No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content, or gore.

3) No AI Generated Content of any kind.

AI generated content of any kind is not allowed in this community; as decided by the community of July 2025

  1. No Mockup Shirts - We want to see the actual shirt worn in real life, not just a depiction.
  1. No Advertising - This applies to someone else or yourself.
  1. No Spamming - Please refrain from sharing the same thing over and over again, and/or posting new content more than three times a day.

Thank you.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
TehBamski@lemmy.world
111
{Closed} [New Rule Vote] - No AI Slop - (July 2025) (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/shirtsthatgohard@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yes or No

Should our community allow for AI Slop images to be posted to it?

~~Please vote here >>> strawpoll.com/XOgOVDGmrn3~~

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 73 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most of the fun is that people actually wear the shirts out in public. If it's AI then it's more like a comic strip with a funny shirt.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What if the picture is from a real person wearing the t-shirt, but the t-shirt design is AI slop?

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Then that's fine. As long as it's a photo of a person in public. As opposed to like a preview image from a make-your-own-shirt website and not even a real shirt that exists. I don't know if that aligns with the purpose of this sub though.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Well. That’s unambiguous.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The wording of the poll is designed so that everyone will vote no.

The problem is that AI opponents will think it means "no AI generated images" but AI enthusiasts will think it means "only high quality AI generated images". It might be a good idea to clarify what the rule means before people get upset.

[–] Steve@communick.news 15 points 4 months ago

Just change "slop" to "generated".
Less derisive. More clear.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

It either makes absolutely no sense or is like the most explicitly biased referendum wording I’ve ever heard…

No one wants “slop” but it seems likely “AI slop” is meant to be anything GenAI?

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 7 points 4 months ago

Creativity is a huge part of quality.

[–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

VPN user voting not allowed
:(

[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, sorry about that. I didn't want to run the risk of manipulation of the poll.

What would have been your vote though?

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 4 months ago

Would've voted No. It's less funny when the shirts aren't real.

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 4 points 4 months ago

That site has some clever but evil ad placement. Went to click the “View results” button and it changed before my finger tapped it to a Reddit ad and took me to Reddit. Gross.