this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
233 points (97.6% liked)

Anything But Metric

514 readers
278 users here now

Americans will use anything but metric

The Rules:

  1. Posts must be a screenshot, crosspost, or link to someone using a bizarre unit of measurement (33 lanes wide, as heavy as 10 semi-trucks, etc.)

  2. Standard units are not allowed, unless it's a sufficiently bizarre usage of the unit (this is up to mod discretion.)

  3. Intentionally terrible units are completely fine! Satire is welcome here

  4. Curses are fine, slurs are not. If there are slurs in something you want to post, please blur them, or reconsider posting.

  5. Flag NSFW content as such. NSFW words in these posts don't need to be censored.

  6. Post titles should be just the unit of measurement used (not the thing being measured!), and should be the full name of the unit (Apples and Bags of Apples imply very different things!) NSFW units should be partially censored. If there are multiple units, list as many as you want. If the source is satire, the title should start with [Satire]

  7. In the comments be civil, both to each other AND the subject of posts.

Mod Policy:

founded 6 months ago
233
Giraffe (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) by HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/anythingbutmetric@discuss.tchncs.de
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

americans will use anything but metric

Daily Mail is UK

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 11 points 7 hours ago

In my mind half a giraffe is just a horse. Just say it is the size of a horse.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's usually not the scientists that write shitty headlines like this 🫤

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean. The Daily Mail Online is known to be one of the most rigorous publications!

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 48 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Assume a spherical giraffe.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago

On a frictionless plane?

[–] original_reader@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Why do some have the need to describe things in the oddest "measurements"? I understand that it makes it easier to imagine sometimes, but "half a" ... never mind, found someone who explains this much better than me: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/for-want-of-a-half-giraffe/

Thanks, Charles C. W. Cooke.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How many bananas are we talking about here?

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

The third half

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago

That’s an easy one, down the middle.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 5 points 11 hours ago

A giraffe is a unit of mass....

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago
[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Halving always produces equal proportions

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago

Only when halved along a line of symmetry.

A body cut in half at the waist, leaves you with two very different halves despite being the same length/height.

Cut in half along the spine though and you could have two equal, yet mirrored, halves.

With a long neck like a giraffe, half way down the length between the head+tail, one of those 'halves' is going to be much heavier/bulkier.