I like that they put “could” in there. A lot of articles claim improvements “are” coming to solar or battery, then it never happens.
M8, this is science, we're on c/science. Something that can do something but isn't verified in a specific environment is a "could". This is how literally every single advancement is made.
So I'm rather confused why it's distasteful to have a feed of new information that we didn't know before. Which is scientific news.
They didn't claim it's distasteful, quite the opposite.
I suppose tone is rather difficult on the internet (see: Poe's Law). To me the tone was one of distaste/unsatisfaction with the "could". As if OP is upset that hey keep seeing "could" but no actual implementation.
How does this bode for longevity?
Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.