this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

MTG

2219 readers
12 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evu@mtgzone.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Scryfall (and before it, magiccards.info) has been outdoing Gatherer for years, but I don't think Wizards of the Coast can afford not to have a searchable card database that they control. For all I know, they've offered to contract the work out to Scryfall, but Scryfall refused, or it would have been too expensive. But if WotC decides to just leave it up to Scryfall, and Scryfall folds, or makes an editorial decision WotC doesn't agree with, that would put them in the difficult position of having to revive and update Gatherer on short notice. They need a resource that they own. And as a player, I would rather they not own Scryfall. I think Scryfall is better because they get to make their own decisions.

[–] SiegeRhino@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

the unspoken reason for keeping gatherer around is that they want the official source of card images to be low res images that make for bad proxies

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

WotC needs gatherer because of errata and oracle text. Like you said, they can't afford to have a third party in control of it. Like what happens at a Pro Tour and a judge makes the wrong call because of a typo or something in the database? An official database is needed to have the final word.

I don't think the site needs a visual overhaul. I think it's just the code was written in 2009 and it's poorly optimized for web browsing in 2025.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The only update that gatherer needs is the ability to pick two or more cards and have it tell you how their rules interact.

[–] Artemis201@mstdn.social 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

@nokturne213 @MysticKetchup I wish computers were that smart. That's a task that has to be done by hand for most of the scenarios we'd actually care about

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's a task that has to be done by hand for most of the scenarios we'd actually care about

They’d better start typing.

[–] silverchase@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

"Let's crash Arena" mode

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly just CNAME gatherer to Scryfall and call it a day. Scryfall is so much better than WOTC's implementation, and competing against it seems pointless if they can somehow find a way to collaborate instead.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

At this point they should just make it redirect to Scryfall.

[–] silverchase@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

I remember hearing in one episode of Rosewater's podcast, he actually implies he's looking at Scryfall while talking about some list of cards.

[–] MysticKetchup@mtgzone.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, the new look is nice but I can't imagine it's as functional as Scryfall