this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
1158 points (99.6% liked)

Europe

5974 readers
1036 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The "Accept all" button is often the standard for cookie banners. An administrative court has ruled that the opposite offer is also necessary.

Lower Saxony's data protection officer Denis Lehmkemper can report a legal victory in his long-standing battle against manipulatively designed cookie banners. The Hanover Administrative Court has confirmed his legal opinion in a judgment of March 19 that has only just been made public: Accordingly, website operators must offer a clearly visible "reject all" button on the first level of the corresponding banner for cookie consent requests if there is also the frequently found "accept all" option. Accordingly, cookie banners must not be specifically designed to encourage users to click on consent and must not prevent them from rejecting the controversial browser files.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cookie banners need to piss off forever. You may set some functional cookies only if I log in.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

what about color scheme cookies?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

You may set some functional cookies only if I log in.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago

websites should be allowed fun and whimsy

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I recently started to use "I still don't care about cookies". So far so good.

[–] ewo@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 days ago

This and Consent-o-matic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

A friend of a friends relative's 2nd cousin mentioned that pornography sites have been surprisingly compliant about this, already.

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago

FINALLY! I was wondering how long it'd take for people to act upon the fact that Permission prompts have become THE biggest digital grift. The answer: way too fucking long!

[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Next up: No more allowed" followed by "No banners allowed, setting cookies is only even possible after user account creation"... please?

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As always, it's not the technology that's the problem, it's the grifters running the show. Cookies are great for remembering what's in a shopping basket, language settings, etc before you sign in and if those were the only kinds of things the sites were using they wouldn't even need the Cookie banner. Remember the Cookie Banner is nothing to do with Cookies, and everything to do with commercialised mass monitoring.

[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Remember the Cookie Banner is nothing to do with Cookies, and everything to do with commercialised mass monitoring.

That is very much true, but there's plenty of things that can happen before the final death rattle of commercialised mass monitoring in the wake of some hypothetical future Glorious Revolution. I have my doubts I'll live to see it so I'll take what I can get.

As always, it’s not the technology that’s the problem, it’s the grifters running the show. Cookies are great for remembering what’s in a shopping basket, language settings, etc before you sign in and if those were the only kinds of things the sites were using they wouldn’t even need the Cookie banner.

Well, all these useful things require some form of user action. There's no need to remember a language setting until a language is set and there is no need to remember things in a shopping basket until they are put there. I'd draw the conclusion that there is no need to set any cookies for anyone before any of these actions happen.

It's probably a meaningless gripe though... I mean, let's be honest here, tracking cookies are so 2010s anyway, even if they were to disappear completely, I doubt the grifters would meaningfully miss them for long, there's much better stuff in the arsenal by now.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Another layer of annoying on a massively stupid piece of legislation that has made the internet immeasurably worse for everyone.

These preferences should be settable in the browser, transferred during http* connection and honoured by every single website you use.

Any changes that marketeers come up with should be ratified in the same way that changes to internet protocols are, and if the browser doesn't support them yet, they are assumed "do not".

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, stupid legislation ruined cars, now I my entire trip is ruined since I have to buckle up my seatbelt at the beginning of a trip.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›