Wild West Canada

54 readers

108 users here now

This is a community for Western Canadians who believe it's time to chart our own course — to stand together, break free from Eastern control, and pursue an independent, sovereign nation built on our values. We stand for freedom of speech, the right to privacy, and the inherent right to self-defense — principles that are essential to a free and just society.

founded 3 days ago

MODERATORS

sammyspamsalot@lemmy.ca

-51

Suggestions on Direction (lemmy.ca)

submitted 3 days ago by sammyspamsalot@lemmy.ca to c/WildWestCanada@lemmy.ca

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I want everyone (in support of this group) to have a voice in the direction of this subreddit. What kind of things do you want to see? Specific content, changes, rules, etc? I'm wide open to suggestions. Leave them in the comments below.

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ACalmGorilla@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

You could move to America instead of being a canker sore here.

[–] Xhead@lemmings.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How about you flip that flag for a start.

[+] sammyspamsalot@lemmy.ca -17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Read about what it means before you leave embarassing comments.

[–] Xhead@lemmings.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It really doesn't matter what it means.

It's disrespectful and embarrassing. You can voice your negative opinions all you want and I'll respect that. This country isn't perfect and we've never been more divided.

But you dishonour the men and woman who died defending the very ground you stand on.

I'm disappointed that people like you think this is acceptable.

[–] Acemod@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Canada isn't in distress because you didn't get the result you wanted Ivan.

[+] sammyspamsalot@lemmy.ca -16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Agree to disagree, I guess. Bet you'd sing a different tune if your party kept losing due to disproportionate representstion. And is Ivan some kind of new slang I missed out on?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yes! Voter reform needs to happen, the fact that the ndp and block got almost the same amount of votes, but fewer seats, and thus are under represented is abhorrent. Same goes to the non con voters in Alberta and Saskatchewan. They suffer under the rule of the cons against their will

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Even with a reform, the CPC would not have gained enough seats to lead the parliament.

| | 🔴 LPC | 168 | 177 | 156 | 163 | | 🔵 CPC | 143 | 134 | 148 | 141 | | ⚜️ BQ | 23 | 18 | 23 | 24 | | 🟠 NDP | 7 | 14 | 15 | 15 | | 🟢 GP | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | 🟣 PPC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Distortion | 5.1 | 6.2 | 2.5 | 3.2 |

To blame the current voting system doesn't change the outcome at this moment, and reflect the will of the ~~majority~~ largest group of voters for a single party.

Source: https://ici.radio-canada.ca/info/2025/elections-federales/mode-scrutin-uninominal-majoritaire-proportionnelle/

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh yes I do agree that vote reform wouldn't have made the cons win.

and reflect the will of the majority of voters.

That part i don't fully agree with, as the majority of votes weren't cast for the liberals.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, wrong word. I mean the largest group of voters.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Ah yes, fully agree there, I think it's the plurality of votes

[–] Acemod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I don't have a party.

Yeah, apparently.

And you are crying into your beer because a party didn't read the room and their leader shot them in the leg.

Also don't assume shit about me.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I suggest not being anti Canadian, but you do you buckaroo.