this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
136 points (98.6% liked)

UK Politics

3346 readers
250 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The UK and Ukraine have agreed a £2.26bn loan to support Ukraine's defence capabilities, Finance Minister Serhiy Marchenko says.

Volodymyr Zelensky and Sir Keir Starmer, together with Chancellor Rachel Reeves, held a video call with Marchenko this evening.

Marchenko wrote on social media, external that the funds are "ensured by frozen Russian assets".

He added that he was "grateful" to the UK for "holding the aggressor accountable for the war".
[…]
Posting on X in the last few moments, Zelensky wrote: "This loan will enhance Ukraine’s defence capabilities and will be repaid using revenues from frozen Russian assets.

"The funds will be directed toward weapons production in Ukraine. This is true justice - the one who started the war must be the one to pay.

"I thank the people and government of the United Kingdom for their tremendous support from the very beginning of this war.

"We are happy to have such strategic partners and to share the same vision of what a secure future should look like for all."

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

Where will all the fighters come from then? This is just a transfer of wealth to arms manufacturers, or perhaps a way to keeping Ukrainian people in debt after the war.

Unless you want to start ww3 by sending nato troops.

https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/02/26/ukraine-is-scrambling-to-find-fresh-fighters

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Endless war, fuck the poor

I'm loathe to praise Starmer for anything but he does deserve credit for this. Hopefully he doesn't then turn around and suck up even more to Trump

[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Needed after the US so publicly ended its "leader of the free world" circle-jerk. Ukraine needs to resist long enough, and Europe needs to rearm fast enough, to mitigate disaster. This and other financial support will buy some of that time.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 day ago

US is is getting gutted from within. We should be helping obviously but at this point if EU can't do this for next 4 years, Ukraine is fucked.

They will fight until they can't and then they will need to resettled within EU anyway...

2020s a decade when the world figured how people with out a homeland get generated IRL

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Some of the US contribution to the Ukraine war effort was in the form of older equipment or credits to purchase arms from US weapons sellers (i.e. the funds just recycled back to the US).

Wondering why these UK funds are in the form of 'loans?'

It sounds like these may be to help Ukraine domestically manufacture their own arms.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth -1 points 1 day ago

Good stuff. We collectively weren't doing enough before, and now a big chunk of the "we" has been lost.