this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
1233 points (98.7% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

4186 readers
1553 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tiktok video: https://www.tiktok.com/@cattlemenfamilyfarms/video/7467698017559170350

Bsky post: https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3lhrdl5nt222s

Articles:

spoiler

ft.com US farmers ‘prepare for the worst’ in new Trump trade war Guy Chazan 7–9 minutes

Aaron Lehman’s soyabean farm in the heartland of Iowa feels like an oasis of calm in the turbulence and tumult of President Donald Trump’s second term. Yet all that could change in a matter of weeks.

Lehman is bracing himself for the impact of a potential trade war hatched in Washington that he says could lay low the US corn belt and irreparably harm America’s standing with its neighbours.

“Farmers understand that trading relationships go up on a stairway, where you work hard to build them up, but go down on an elevator — very, very fast,” Lehman said in the living room of his farmhouse about 20 miles north of Iowa’s capital Des Moines.

“The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner.”

It has been a turbulent week in US trade policy. Trump announced last weekend that he would impose 25 per cent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, saying they were not doing enough to stem the flow of migrants and the illicit drug fentanyl into the US. Then after last-minute talks with the two countries’ leaders, he agreed to give them both a 30-day reprieve.

The same was not the case for China. The 10 per cent levy he imposed on all Chinese imports still stands. And many in Iowa believe it is only a matter of time before the tariffs on America’s northern and southern neighbours are reinstated.

The opening salvo of a new trade war has sent a chill through the Midwest. Canada, Mexico and China together account for half of all American agricultural exports. Just last year, the US sold more than $30bn in farm products to Mexico, $29bn to Canada and $26bn to China, according to American Farm Bureau statistics.

Suddenly, farmers were facing the spectre of retaliatory tariffs and the prospect of a full-scale conflict that some fear could decimate America’s rural heartland. Two large grain silos and an old shed sit on a dry, grassy area with expansive flat fields in the background under a partly cloudy sky Farmers fear a full-scale trade war could decimate America’s rural heartland © Amir Prellberg/FT

Farmers in an area of the country that has become a bedrock of support for Trump now worry that the president’s tariffs, though suspended at the last minute, have permanently damaged the image of the US in the eyes of its most important trading partners.

“We’ve gone from being a seller of choice to a seller of last resort,” said Mark Mueller, a farmer from near Waterloo in north-east Iowa.

Few US states better embody the agricultural wealth of the Midwest than Iowa. It is a land of vast corn fields stretching as far as the eye can see, the landscape broken by the occasional grain silo, hay bale or low-slung barn. Hogs outnumber people more than seven to one.

It is also Trump country. Although Iowa voted for Democratic presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, it backed Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 in ever greater numbers.

More than a fifth of Iowa’s economy — or $53.1bn — is tied to agriculture, from crop and livestock production to food processing and manufacturing. It is the country’s largest producer of corn, hogs, eggs and ethanol and a top-three grower of soyabeans. That makes it particularly vulnerable to any downturn in agricultural exports.

“Free trade is the backbone of the economy in the Midwest,” said Ernie Goss, an economist at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. “What we have here is some of the most productive agriculture on the face of the Earth, and the domestic market is not even close to being big enough to absorb all the commodities produced here. You have to have international markets.” Aaron Lehman is seated near a window inside a room, wearing glasses and a checkered shirt ‘The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner,’ said Aaron Lehman © Amir Prellberg/FT

The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Trump in his first term. Among the most striking moves was Trump imposing duties on $300bn of Chinese goods. Beijing responded in 2018 by slapping 25 per cent tariffs on imports of US soyabeans, beef, pork, wheat, corn and sorghum.

The skirmish ended with the countries signing a trade deal in 2020 under which Beijing pledged to increase its purchases of US goods and services. But since then, it has been buying more grain from countries such as Argentina and Brazil, which overtook the US as China’s top supplier of corn in 2023.

In the last trade war, “a lot of our Asian buyers started developing relationships with soyabean producers in South America, and they’ve taken more and more of our market”, said Lehman, who is also president of the Iowa Farmers Union. “And we haven’t got it back.”

Not all of Iowa’s farmers oppose the way Trump has used the threat of tariffs to achieve a key policy objective — stemming illegal immigration.

“It was a strategy he needed to use to . . . get those countries to the negotiating table,” said Steve Kuiper, a fourth-generation Iowa farmer who grows corn and soyabeans in Marion County, south-east of Des Moines. After all, “a president has just four years to accomplish all he’s promised to do, so he’s got to get things going immediately to gain traction”.

Still, he is pessimistic that Mexico and Canada will be able to deliver on their pledges to Trump to strengthen border security in time. “It takes forever for these things to happen, and they’ve only got 30 days,” he said. A view through a window shows a barren soybean field The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Donald Trump in his first term © Amir Prellberg/FT

The prospect of another round of trade tensions comes with American farmers already in a tight spot, hit by a fall in crop prices and higher costs. Net farm income, a broad measure of profits, was $181.9bn in 2022 but is projected to have been $140.7bn in 2024, according to data from the US Department of Agriculture — a 23 per cent slump.

“This [trade war] isn’t coming at a good time,” said Rick Juchems, a farmer from near Plainfield in north-east Iowa. “Commodity prices are low and the price of inputs like seed and fertiliser is going up.” Sources from the Iowa Corn Growers Association said many farmers had been producing at a $100 per acre loss.

Investments in new equipment are down, reflecting the wider downturn, said Juchems. “I’ve got friends who’ve lost their jobs selling agricultural machinery because of reduced demand. The lots are full of unsold tractors.”

Makers of farm equipment such as Deere, Kinze Manufacturing and Bridgestone/Firestone have shed hundreds of jobs in Iowa since last year.

Yet the prospects for farm finances could get even gloomier if Trump makes good on his threat of import levies. Fertiliser, for example, could become much more expensive, since more than 80 per cent of the US’s supply of potash — a key ingredient — comes from Canada.

But perhaps the most destructive effect of the tariff debate is the uncertainty it has triggered, just ahead of the crucial spring planting season.

“We’ll get by as long as we know what’s coming,” said Juchems. “But things are changing all the time. I’m sure the whole world is laughing at us.”

Lehman said farmers were trying to stay optimistic. “They tell me they’re hopeful cooler heads will prevail and this dispute will result in good trade agreements,” said Lehman. “But they’re also preparing for the worst.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 59 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And he will still vote red in the midterms because otherwise a trans woman might get to play darts.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

hating a kid that might be different is more important than his farm.

Won't stop him from crying on camera about losing his livelihood due to his own actions, and probably low-key blame democrats for letting it happen.. as these fucktards always do.

[–] commander@lemmings.world -3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe we should just allow these people to call others what they want without trying to censor them at every turn.

Then we can focus on more important issues like the growing disparity in wealth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 34 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

I saw this guy's Tiktok on my FYP a couple of hours after he posted it, and in the comments he was DOUBLING DOWN on voting for Trump. He's now either deleted them, or they've gotten buried.

Either way I don't think these guys are getting it, even as they lose everything.

[–] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 25 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Sunk cost fallacy. Also, admitting to having been wrong is hard. It's one of the core mechanisms cults use to ensure loyalty. The more embarrassing, absurd and shameful the accepted "truths" become, the harder it is to exit the cult.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 270 points 1 day ago (3 children)

reagan bankrupted thousands of farmers too. conservatives are horrible for the rural voters who always hit that button

[–] Glent@lemmy.ca 126 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yea but do dems have cowboy hats? See, you vote for the hat cuz that means you share VALYOOOZ!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

George W was awful to the military and veterans get screwed by republicans all the time. Yet they love republicans and vote for them in droves. People don’t make sense.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People don’t make sense.

Sure they do. Stupid people fall for propaganda and these losers are stuuuuuuuupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Turns out racism trumps all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I literally don't even get schadenfreude from these faceless people being attacked by leopards. This country is being destroyed because people chose hate over listening to any source that wasn't Fox News. For years... So now we all have to suffer?

[–] commander@lemmings.world -1 points 7 hours ago

This country is being destroyed because people chose hate

Hate was chosen for them by the rich and powerful.

We all bear part of the burden for why the rich and powerful are so rich and powerful; we made them that way and keep rewarding their greed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Good.

MAGAts can only learn the hard way.

So this chode actually has a shot at learning something for once in his life.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No he'd vote for Trump all over again tomorrow. He doesn't care how clearly bad this is for him, he's still better than black people, women, and Hispanics.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah the one part of the article someone was more worried about border security than their own ability to farm.

Well I cant afford to eat anymore, the products all became to expensive and I'm going to have to sell my farm for Nickles on the dollar but it's alright, because those other people trying to escape inflation somewhere else, didn't get a chance at an opportunity either.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is all of the innocent people who have to starve to death to teach them this lesson.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The farming section of the 2025 Project spelled this out.

If they were so important to us then why did they vote that way to harm us ?

Is this what liberal tears taste like ?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

We tried to deprive you of this disillusionment. You could have lived the rest of your life in bitterness after Trump lost and got convicted of more crimes - and at least you still would have had your farm. But no, you had to go and hand him your fucking farm.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 196 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Mr. Farmer, when trump talks about finding fraud in government, he's referring to USAID paying you for your farm products. You are the waste he is referring to.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This dude doesn't mention Trump or Republicans once during the entire video. I wouldn't be surprised at all if somehow he blames this on the previous administration. I've already had multiple conversations blaming any adverse effects from Trump's decisions on Biden and the Democrats in a similar fashion.

[–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 13 points 22 hours ago

In the TikTok video, no, but in the BlueSky video, he mentions he voted for Trump. Although, your point most likely still stands, because he doesn't place blame.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dude doesn't quite connect the dots. The government — under Biden — had a deal to save his farm. The government — under Trump — is changing all the rules, reneging on the contract. If all he groks from this is "government bad," then game over. Except it's not a game.

[–] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My impression from the video is that all he is taking from this situation is “government bad.”

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 110 points 1 day ago

The "conservative" plan is and has always been to eliminate small businesses. That dipshit's land will get gobbled up by a corporation.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 88 points 1 day ago (9 children)

we can only hope this is the rock bottom that people need in order to see their way out of the fox news pit of lies.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 96 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] betahack@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

FUCK THEM ALL FAFO

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I dislike how the slow roll of economy coincides with voting cycles. These iowan farmers would get gutted now, but the whole impact of that would grow well over 4 years of presidency, and those dealing with it by them would not get credit for it like it always happens, and many would vote degenerate right again as they usually do.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

In four years, these same people will vote against their own interest again because "Trump said he would save my farm after this next election". While conveniently overlooking the fact that both parties will be offering to save their farm by that time, and only one of those will have actual solutions and won't have caused the problem in the first place.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nick@midwest.social 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol good. Reap the bullshit you’ve sown, dipshits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They never care until it happens to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›