363
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago
[-] avieshek@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

sonarr goes brrrrrr…

[-] dragonlobster@programming.dev 4 points 18 hours ago

These things are unreliable, I had 3 seagate HDDs in a row fail on me. Never had an issue with SSDs and never looked back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 36 points 1 day ago

My first HDD had a capacity of 42MB. Still a short way to go until factor 10⁶.

[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

My first HD was a 20mb mfm drive :). Be right back, need some “just for men” for my beard (kidding, I’m proud of it).

[-] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

So was mine, but the controller thought it was 10mb so had to load a device driver to access the full size.

Was fine until a friend defragged it and the driver moved out of the first 10mb. Thereafter had to keep a 360kb 5¼" drive to boot from.

That was in an XT.

[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

it honestly could have been a 10mb, I don't even remember. only thing I really do remember is thinking it was interesting how it used the floppy and second cable, and how the sound it made was used in every 90's and early 2000's tv and movie show as generic computer noise :)

You have me beat on the XT, mine was a 286, although it did replace an Apple 2e (granted both were aquired several years after they were already considered junk in the 386 era).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Was fine until a friend defragged it and the driver moved out of the first 10mb

Oh noooo 😭

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

cool never will buy another seagate ever though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is for cold and archival storage right?

I couldn't imagine seek times on any disk that large. Or rebuild times....yikes.

[-] noobface@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

up your block size bro 💪 get them plates stacking 128KB+ a write and watch your throughput gains max out 🏋️ all the ladies will be like🙋‍♀️. Especially if you get those reps sequentially it's like hitting the juice 💉 for your transfer speeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Definitely not for either of those. Can get way better density from magnetic tape.

They say they got the increased capacity by increasing storage density, so the head shouldn't have to move much further to read data.

You'll get further putting a cache drive in front of your HDD regardless, so it's vaguely moot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 5 points 22 hours ago

The two models, [...] each offer a minimum of 3TB per disk

Huh? The hell is this supposed to mean? Are they talking about the internal platters?

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

More than likely

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
363 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59982 readers
2762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS