News: 'Do not release the dog with his hands up!': Black man mauled by police canine following Ohio pursuit (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Drusas@kbin.social to c/politics@kbin.social

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Jadarrius Rose, 23, is seen on video during the July 4 traffic stop with his hands up surrendering to police before an officer deployed his canine.

A police dog mauled a Black man in Ohio during a July 4th traffic stop after he surrendered to authorities with his hands raised in the air following a "lengthy pursuit," according to officials.

A Motor Carrier Enforcement inspector with the Ohio State Highway Patrol (OSHP) attempted to stop 23-year-old Jadarrius Rose who was driving a semi-tractor trailer because it "was missing a left rear mud flap," according to an incident report. Rose was traveling westbound on U.S. Route 35 and failed to stop for the inspector and troopers who were called in for help.

Stop sticks were deployed twice on the vehicle before it came to a stop on U.S. Route 23.

"After several times of being ordered to exit the vehicle, the suspect exited the vehicle from the driver’s side door," the incident report stated. "The driver was given orders to get down on the ground and the suspect would not comply."

Rose can be seen on video released by the OSHP standing in front of troopers with his hands in the air.

An officer with the Circleville Police Department who has a K9 with him can be heard telling Rose to "go on the ground or you’re gonna get bit." Meanwhile, a trooper with the OSHP is telling Rose to "come to me."

It was then that the Circleville Police Department officer, identified as "R. Speakman," deployed his K9.

[article continues]

top 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Not only did the police target this black man for essentially no reason (really? You chase a driver, which is dangerous to the entire community, because he's missing a mud flap?), the responding officers gave mixed commands at the same time, and then assaulted him with a dog while he had already surrendered.

Anyone want to bet that the culprit here gets a paid vacation while his department investigates and finds no wrongdoing?

We need to redo the police system in the US from the ground up.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

The crime was driving while black. The cruelty is the point.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the power tripping. That's a big part of the point as well.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yep. The point is to either force the "undesirables" into an underclass or to leave.

[-] Xeelee@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

We need to redo the police system in the US from the ground up.

The system works exactly as designed.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

k9 units are medieval levels of behind the times. but toxic masculinity thinks they're cool.

[-] QHC@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

They are also worse than random chance at actually doing the one thing police claim technology can't match: drug and bomb sniffing. Dogs just want to go take a nap or get a treat, and their handlers are cops who just think everything is suspicious so of course they get lots of "hits".

It's essentially the same bullshit that hoodwinked the world with Coco the "signing" guerilla for a couple of decades.

[-] HexTrace@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

The fact that handlers can fake a "hit" wherever and whenever they want is the entire point, and also the reason they resist moving over to technical solutions. Those technologies also come with logging, which is another point against them as far as cops are concerned.

It's always been about control and cruelty.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're still around to use as bullshit "probable cause" to hassle and search people's cars for drugs. Because the war on drugs was a good idea, and dogs have not repeatedly been shown to be complete bullshit. They indicate when their handler wants them to. It's been proven so many times. Yet, it's probable cause.

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

More from the article:

"Do not release the dog with his hands up!" a trooper can be heard yelling multiple times ahead of Speakman releasing the dog.

The video shows the dog running towards Rose, who came to his knees as Speakman released the K9.

Video appears to show the dog biting and pulling Rose by his arm as he screams loudly.

"Get it off!" Rose screams repeatedly.

"Get the dog off of him!" a trooper is heard yelling.

Other officers on the scene can be heard calling for a first aid kit.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not clear if the officer responsible for directing the dog to attack Rose is facing any disciplinary action.

Of course not, any disciplinary action will wait until the department's PR department has established whether or not there is a significant media backlash. Bad publicity (potentially spurring ethical reform) is the only reason a cop ever gets disciplined, after all.

[-] Idrunkenlysignedup@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Even if the officer gets fired there's nothing stopping him from applying for and getting a job in a different precinct.

[-] livedeified@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

stories like these are too common. seems like the standard is for them to get a vacation when caught being cruel.

[-] QHC@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Even if it was a known murderer, there is zero practical reason to engage in a projected car chase.

Not to mention, why do we need armed militia to enforce traffic laws? you know, the thing that usually has a maximum penalty in the hundreds of dollars? These aren't even real crimes! Somehow we figured out that parking meters don't need guns or tasers, but why did we stop there?

[-] Xeelee@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The armed militia is need to terrorize and intimidate the population. They're doing exactly what they're being paid for.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Sounds like Jadarrius had a good reason to not stop when the cops tried to flag him down for nothing at all. He knew this was going to be a "driving while black" stop and his life was at high risk.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

My thought exactly. He probably didn't stop because he knew he was targeted and was in danger. And he was right.

[-] n0m4n@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

A later, follow-up news source has reported that the driver had talked to a police dispatcher and "was afraid for his life".

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And he was clearly right to be.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

OK, so what's the plan then? Just keep driving and hope they get bored?

[-] n0m4n@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Involving others so there are witnesses may have saved his life, or at least more serious injuries. The driver is alive, so he at least accomplished that part.

[-] the_thunder_god@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Once they get him stopped, get him out of the vehicle, and have his hands up, he's surrendering. He got multiple conflicting commands....and with the presence of the dog he was rightfully concerned they were going to have it tackle him...that's exactly what happened. So his concern about the dog probably caused him to ignore a command or two, because he was fearing the dog attacking him. Take the dog out of the equation and he probably surrenders peacefully and obeys commands. Conflicting commands and the presence of the dog are absolutely the problems here.

They will be put on paid leave and any lawsuit filed will be thrown out because of qualified immunity...even though the dog never should have come out of the holding vehicle. Could have a case of excessive force, but I doubt it. All of it will be excused as part of the police work, even the mauling.

[-] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The scenario you describe, and a limitless spectrum of other possibilities that could exist during any encounter, are the source of so much frustration for me when these events come up.

The person being interacted with could be exceptionally fearful, panicked, on drugs, drunk, having a medical event, deaf, experiencing mental health issues, severely autistic, or just stupid.

YET that person, who could be ANY of those things or more, becomes a justified target for violence the moment they fail to comply with an order that they may not be capable of understanding, or may be too deep into their own circumstances to understand or even process.

Meanwhile, the police they interact with who are (presumably, ostensibly) sober, well trained, mentally well, have backup available, and have a number of different options available to them, will always get a free pass for taking the opportunity to deploy that violence until and unless there's enough public outcry to force some action, and sometimes not even then.

How does that not strike anyone who reads it as an unacceptable framework for policing?

[-] FuzzyDoublePumper@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

He was missing a mud flap. Certainly pulling guns and releasing dogs was required. Couldn't they just send his employer a ticket or call that "how's my driving?" number on the truck?

load more comments

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023

41 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

7 readers

1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago