this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
57 points (95.2% liked)

Nintendo

18401 readers
1 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I loved BotW and TotK but I really don't want crafting or weapon endurance systems in the next mainline Zelda title.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Agreed. They are definitely the best open world survival (lite) games I have played but I also dislike survival games. Overall they are probably my 7th and 8th favourite Zelda games while removing the survival and crafting elements would push them in to my top 5.

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I enjoyed botw. Had a hard time of getting in to botw 2. I'm actually looking forward to playing the new Zelda game. I think I'll enjoy it more.

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no dlc for you!

the one fucking game i would ~~easily~~ automatically shell out money for dlc.. nope.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It basically is DLC, for BOTW (and well worth it)

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i read it was almost a complete rewrite. they had to recreate all the objects with valid properties for all the new physics.

which makes me even more astonished they dont milk it. maybe im just used to agencies beating dead horses.

e. mentioned a little here: https://www.gamedeveloper.com/programming/how-nintendo-did-the-impossible-with-tears-of-the-kingdom-s-physics-system

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

The devs said at one point that some of the ideas in ToTK were supposed to be DLC at one point.

That's it. That's all some people are processing. "Oh it's just DLC." Facts don't matter. It doesn't matter that the reason it wasn't DLC was that they kept expanding on the ideas. It doesn't matter that the final product was a full game. "But they reused the map!!!!!! 😡😡😡😡"

The "it's just DLC lol" nonsense will persist until the end of time.

[–] kalimari@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

TOTK shares more code with Nintendo Switch Sports than it does with BOTW

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Special Award: Street Fighter 6 🤣🤣🤣🤣

What a garbage circle jerk of a show.

[–] LolcatXTREME@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

What do you mean