338
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Programming is the easy part, and a useless skill on its own.

If you can only program in one language, you can't program.

C++ is the single best language to learn programming.

Stupid mistakes you make are not bugs, at least not for you.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] valentino@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

The amount of unqualified people is staggering beginning with those who have no university education.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Good programmers need to be creative, flexible (soft skills with others), critical thinkers, and problem solvers. Lacking those kinds of features makes for a rigid and terrible programmer that is near impossible to work with or code behind. Leave the ego at the door.

[-] CodeBlooded@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

Python, and dynamically typed languages in general, are known as being great for beginners. However, I feel that while they’re fun for beginners, they should only be used if you really know what you’re doing, as the code can get messy real fast without some guard rails in place (static typing being a big one).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vvv@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Mandatory pull requests + approvals within a team are a waste of everyone's time.

[-] apd@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Big hot take to me; especially in an organization with a large size and code high standard

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] eeleech@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I find that S-expressions are the best syntax for programming languages. And in general infix operators are inferior to either prefix or postfix notation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] nomecks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

If you're not a programming superstar you can probably make more money writing nothing but Terraform code for hapless enterprises.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lukstru@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

If your function is longer than 10 statements, parts can almost always be extracted into smaller parts. If named correctly, this improves readability significantly

[-] words_number@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

HELL NO! If you split that function into three, but these always have to be called in succession, you win nothing but make your code WAY harder to read/follow.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
338 points (96.2% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
477 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS