240

Dr. Phil's staged interview with Donald Trump is a sign of the grim political theater to come (www.salon.com)

submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 104 points 4 months ago

Not once did the pop psychologist disagree with Trump’s rant that the election had been stolen and that drug-crazed, mentally ill criminal migrants were invading the U. S. McGraw agreed with Trump that world leaders respect him; that he created the best U.S. economy in history; that he was the best president for Blacks since Abraham Lincoln; and that he tried to calm down crowds chanting “lock her up” about Hilary Clinton. Instead, he asked how Trump could keep going and why people were so energized against him, since he had done such good things for America? Trump replied that he loved the country, and it was just habit for many people to support Democrats, while others were just evil people.

This isn't a surprise. Dr. Phil has always been openly a huge piece of shit that cares more for money than anything else. But dude has his own media personality cult following so of course he had have to do a crossover episode with the felon president.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 51 points 4 months ago

Dr "please come on my show so I can scream at you" is a waste of space. Stop watching the Oprah rejects. Phil & Oz did nothing to help people, just enrich themselves & their HUGE egos.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

It really tells you something about Oprah that she's responsible for both of these grifters being let loose on the world.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

She really did launder a ton of both mis and disinformation through her show over the years.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Jenny McCarthy got a big boost from her in the beginning of her antivax crusade too:

Of course, the notion that vaccines cause autism has never been supported by science. But Oprah gave McCarthy a vast audience via her TV show in 2007.Science journalist Seth Mnookin, who covered this meeting of the minds in his book The Panic Virus, reported that Winfrey “praised McCarthy’s unwillingness to bow to authority, her faith in herself, and her use of the Internet as a tool for bypassing society’s traditional gatekeepers.” Here’s an excerpt from the interview transcript:

MCCARTHY: First thing I did

Google. I put in autism. And I started my research.

WINFREY: Thank God for Google.

MCCARTHY: I’m telling you.

WINFREY: Thank God for Google.

MCCARTHY: The University of Google is where I got my degree from. ... And I put in autism and something came up that changed my life, that led me on this road to recovery, which said autism — it was in the corner of the screen — is reversible and treatable. And I said, What?! That has to be an ad for a hocus-pocus thing, because if autism is reversible and treatable, well, then it would be on Oprah.

Days after that Oprah appearance, McCarthy was invited on Larry King Live and Good Morning America to spread her anti-vaccine message even further. Between the three shows, she reached between 15 million and 20 million viewers with her anti-vaccine message, Mnookin estimated.

To this day, the episode featuring McCarthy, “Mothers Battle Autism,” is featured on Oprah’s website, without any correction or acknowledgment of the problems with McCarthy’s claims.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/9/16868216/oprah-winfrey-pseudoscience

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 42 points 4 months ago

Mr. ~~Burns~~ Trump, your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. Why are you so popular ?

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

Why is Biden not hiring 20-somethings to meme this shit to high hell holy shit.

This earnest photo is hilarious.

[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 9 points 4 months ago

Well, he'll soon be old enough to be a president himself. Just laying the tack for his future i guess

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

How old is that picture?

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Dr.Phil has changed for the worse.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Nah, he's always been a piece of shit.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Has he though?

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024

240 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19159 readers

4432 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News