Green Energy

3625 readers

151 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

222

Nuclear too slow to replace coal, and baseload “simply can’t compete” with wind and solar, AEMO boss says (reneweconomy.com.au)

submitted 1 year ago by phneutral@feddit.org to c/energy@slrpnk.net

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I certainly agree that we've gotten much better at safely producing and storing. However, with climate change worsening, we continue to have unprecedented natural disasters in unexpected areas which concerns me the most.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

What kind of climate change disaster do you think would cause problems with nuclear waste storage?