view the rest of the comments
Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
I didn't bring the piece for discussion.
Trump has said he does not endorse project 2025. So yesthe real world supports me.
I can't prove a negative.
It is funny to watch people squirm over something that isn't even important to the election. I bet they are scared of the dark and think electric is also magic.
Watch the video yourself
https://newrepublic.com/post/183735/trump-caught-cheering-project-2025-video
Can you point to where in the video he mentions 2025? I can't seem to find it.
Obvious bad faith is obvious.
Trump knows nothing about Project 2025 the same way Trump wasn't on Epstein Island.
YEs, it is obvious you are acting in bad faith. You cite something that doesn't say what you claim it says; Trump has publically said he doesn't support Project 2025.
Maybe you should read about Agenda 47.
That is the actual Trump plan. This is the one that will be implemented when Trump wins, and that is worth discussing.