this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
29 points (76.4% liked)

Technology

76278 readers
2844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is still unclear whether Apple will brand the new Apple Watches as unique anniversary models or wait until next year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Jesus, if we’re chasing bigger screens on watches, we’re thinking about them all wrong.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right, especially regarding the iPhone.

But the watch still has a pretty good bezel around the screen. Since you don't have to hold it with your hand, it makes sense to make that bezel as thin as possible (or disappear entirely). The screen would get marginally bigger, but the watch itself would stay the same size.

At least, I hope that's the case.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That isn’t what they’re doing—it says in the article that the measurements are of case height, not screen size within the case. The body of the watch is bigger.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well then I hope Apple Watch wearers all secretly covet the giant, round Google watch from ten years ago.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, they had me for the 1st gen, and then progressively convinced me that I don’t need one as they made it more of a phone.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd like an open source watch that looks nice and has long battery. I think it could be useful to manage whatever the hell is wrong with my brain that I cannot stay focused on a task.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, but it needs a solid philosophy of use behind it so if doesn’t capture all of your attention the same way a phone does.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't think taking all my notifications and moving them to a smaller screen is the solution. That's really compelling for sports, but I'm not doing anything away from my phone for long enough to need that.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will happen. Same shit happened with phones.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The phone made sense up to a point—it has become more like a miniature book, and the changing form has reflected that.

The entire point of the watch is to free yourself from the screen of the phone for basic tasks. If the function of the watch hinges on the screen, then the phone is the better tool for that.

There was a time when Apple understood how the different parts of their ecosystem existed in their own lanes. Tim Cook has not seemed to grasp that one of their greatest strengths was that their devices weren’t designed to do absolutely everything, but rather a few targeted things very well.