this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
10 points (91.7% liked)

shitposting

1798 readers
220 users here now

Rules •1. No Doxxing •2. No TikTok reposts •3. No Harassing •4. Post Gore at your own discretion, Depends if its funny or just gore to be an edgelord.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Depending on the tax system that is an actual issue.

[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

At least in the US there is no possible situation where you'd get less money for making more money.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe that's actually true. I think in the USA there are a few programs that have a hard cap on income to disqualify you. Food and housing assistance related things. I'm not American so I'm not 100% sure on them but I do think there are some scenarios

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

That's true. You'll still be making more money, but you'll also have more expenses. This doesn't apply to most people though, and for sure not ones getting a $10k raise. The progressive tax system we have only applies the tax as you progress through the levels. The first $10k will be taxed at one level, then the next bracket, then the next, etc. It's not done as one lump tax.

Different programs should be set up to slowly decrease how much you get instead of cutoff amounts. That'd remove that issue. Obviously some things are either on or off so they can't be done this way though. Ideally a lot of it should just be provided to everyone no matter what though.