this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
227 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

73346 readers
5519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's a $120usd FLIR - how does it compare with a cheap plug in USB phone module?

Guess it's just missing a mounting case?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

80x62 pixels, there are already other cheaper sensors in this range. FLIR is way more expensive but has much higher res.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm curious to see what the quality is like. If it's a similar case to the Enviro hat, and gives good reliable results for less, fantastic.
If it's like the other cheapie thermal sensors on alibaba, less so.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Btw, why is that? It's not just a CCD in infrared wavelength? Or is it the thermal decoupling part?

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No they are not CCD, they use microbolometers whatever those are. CCD IR sensors are for near infrared only, not the much longer thermal wavelengths.