1360
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vvvvv@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Based on your analogue they drive the car for 7.5 inches (614.4 Kb by 63360 inches by 20 divided by 103179878.4 Kb) and promise based on that that car travels 20mph which might be true, yes, but the scale disproportion is too considerable to not require tests. This is not maths, this is a real physical device - how would it would behave on larger real data remains to be seen.

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Except we know what the lifecycle of physical storage is, it's rate of performance decay (virtually none for solid state until failure), and that the computers performing the operations have consistent performance for the same operations over time. And again, while for a car such a small amount can't be reasonably extrapolated, for a computer processing an extremely simple format like JSON, when it is designed to handle FAR more difficult tasks on the GPU involving billions of floating point operations, it is absolutely, without a doubt enough.

You don't have to believe me if you don't want but I'm very confident in my understanding of JSON's complexity relative to typical GPU workloads, computational analysis, computer hardware durability lifecycles, and software testing principles and best practices. 🤷

this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
1360 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32356 readers
1087 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS