Games

16944 readers

375 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

347

Nearly all Nintendo 64 games can now be recompiled into native PC ports to add proper ray tracing, ultrawide, high FPS, and more (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Blaze@reddthat.com to c/games@sh.itjust.works

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I don’t think it’s possible to takedown a project that doesn’t use any proprietary code. You have to supply your own rom.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 7 months ago

For this instance, before unique identifiers were baked into games like switch games use.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

Does it have legal ground tk stand on? no. Is it possible? yeah definitely

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's what happened to yuzu

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What happened to Yuzu was that they were making $20,000-$30,000 in monthly revenue, for an emulator that would “technically” be competing with the current hardware.

Thats where they fucked up, in my opinion.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, yes the yuzu team did have problems with the money scheme and openly playing games before their release, but the fact that even forks by people who had no connection to the devs got taken down shows that Nintendo can take down any project they want, regardless of if it contains proprietary code

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Yes. I see your point. :/

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can't take down a project you're not trying to control.

Imagine I post a pic of Scarlett Johanson's lovely bits and Nintendo doesn't like that. Nintendo doesn't know me and Nintendo can't take it out of everyone's computers. Now imagine I do the same with some software. What's Nintendo gonna do?

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago

They can still force platforms to delete the stuff or go to a judge and get them to force platforms to take down stuff. They can't get it from your computer, but itlf its posted online it can be taken down.

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Not exactly. A big reason for them being sued is for circumventing Switch’s encryption.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Which is still legal. It's just the flimsy excuse they used to file the lawsuit, and the Yuzu debs didn't have the energy/money to fight it

[–] meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe 2 points 7 months ago

*in some jurisdictions.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That doesn't mean they used proprietary code. The keys were supplied by the users