152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 7 months ago

It's a hypothetical question, read the room ๐Ÿ™„. He's just asking what you would do if you were tasked with making the world a better place.

[-] Steve@communick.news 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If that was the case, they would have asked the question you did. But they didn't. They asked a different question. You're assuming their intent based on your own preconceptions. A common cause for miscommunication and confusion.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Well if they had asked that question, a lot of people would say things like

"How can I spend 40 hours a week making the world a better place when I'm stuck working this shitty job to barely pay for my life?"

[-] Steve@communick.news 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I didn't comment on the quality of, or potential responses to, the new question.
You're also assuming something different than the words I used.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago

Maybe they weren't expecting a bunch of pedantic responses? lmao

[-] Steve@communick.news 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Maybe. But you and I don't know that.
You're guessing their meaning, rather than accepting their words as written.
You're trying to mind read, rather than word read.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

I'm applying "context" and "media literacy", you're being pedantic.

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's another way of saying the same thing. Roughly.
Seems we agree on the facts, and simply value them differently.

[-] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Reading your reply right now is really funny because the OP replied to the same person after you did saying "You heard what I meant"

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

You heard what I meant and I appreciate that. It was poorly phrased and I wish I had explained the theoretical better.

I qualified it with the "naturally industrious" thing because I wanted people to talk about what they'd do after they slept off the drudgery of current capitalism not immediately upon finding out they don't have to go to work anymore just to survive and have basic amenities. As you stated, I could have also phrased in an equally bad way where everyone just pointed at their job and said "I have no time or energy". That's the problem. I was trying to filter out the "If I had UBI, I would smoke weed and eat potato chips all day" answers.

If I had phrased my question as, "if you had a guaranteed income and were able to use 40hrs a week of your time to make the world a better place, what would you do?" That would have been better.

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
152 points (82.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36057 readers
752 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS