415
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 21 points 5 months ago

Didn't I read somewhere they were considering using NixOS instead of messing with unstable Arch and forcing it do stuff it wasn't made for?

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] gramgan@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Switching to Nix could certainly simplify a lot of things. I wouldn't be surprised if they went that direction soon.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The ironic part here is that NixOS and Steam don't really play that well together: Nothing is where pre-built binaries expect it to be on NixOS, including ld.so, so pre-built binaries simply won't run without patching. NixOS can do that for Steam... but as Steam is also downloading binaries, essentially being its own package manager, those binaries then run into the same issue.

OTOH you can just run the whole shebang in a chroot, exposing exactly what Steam expects (couple of libraries and the graphics drivers) which is what NixOS does and I never had any issues.

Another hurdle would be that NixOS is not end-user friendly. It just hasn't been a focus, Valve would need to write a graphical configuration/package management utility. NixOS also doesn't tend to go easy on disk space and network bandwidth which might be considerations, OTOH probably not an issue if they manage their own release channel. Things like flatpack also aren't an issue they get the same treatment Steam does.

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
415 points (89.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20905 readers
1504 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS