417

For me it is the note taking/PKMS tool SilverBullet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Interstellar_1@pawb.social 6 points 9 months ago
[-] ayam@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

Actually you're kinda right, their own license doesn't allow commercial redistribution (kinda similar with CC:NC) which make them not open source. I personally have no problems with that though.

[-] isthereanydeal@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 9 months ago

It is open source. But the license is not foss at the moment. They expresed their desire to make something that send revenue to creators

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 4 points 9 months ago

@isthereanydeal therefore it's not open source. See for something to be called "open source" it needs a bit more than just for the code to be readable. The only people who define open source as source readable are the people who don't want to create open source software.

[-] isthereanydeal@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 9 months ago

There's a clear difference between open source and free open source software. It is open source but the licence is not "free". Not entirely at least

[-] chebra@mstdn.io -1 points 9 months ago

@isthereanydeal Nope. That distinction only appeared when big companies kinda became afraid of open source software, so they wanted to redefine the term, create some confusion, corrupt it..

[-] isthereanydeal@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

You may have a point but there's a difference anyway

[-] heyoni@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Did you unselect your upvote?

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 0 points 9 months ago

@heyoni I'm commenting from mastodon, I don't even see any upvotes. Someone just started downvoting me because they ran out of arguments 🤷‍♂️

[-] heyoni@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

That must be why. On lemmy, like reddit you automatically upvote your own comments. Yours was at 0 probably cause mastodon doesn't do that.

[-] n0x0n@feddit.de 0 points 9 months ago

Open source is when the source code is available.

Free software is when the source is available and the license lets you exercise your 4 freedoms.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io -1 points 9 months ago

@n0x0n You are wrong though: https://opensource.org/osd

> Introduction
> Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code.

Literally the first sentence.

The definition you are using is being spread by the likes of Meta and Amazon.

[-] n0x0n@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Taking only a part of my post does not make sense in this context.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io -1 points 8 months ago

@n0x0n Providing an authoritative source which directly contradicts your statement, that does not make any sense to you? I'm sorry then.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
417 points (98.6% liked)

Open Source

31698 readers
337 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS