this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024

1284 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59385 readers

932 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1284

Threads is automatically hiding comments that mention Pixelfed (mastodon.social)

submitted 8 months ago by nix@merv.news to c/technology@lemmy.world

254 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For anyone wondering if Threads and Facebook at large will be a fine neighbor in the space and compatible with other apps/services in the fediverse: they’re already automatically hiding comments that mention Pixelfed https://mastodon.social/@dansup/112126250737482807

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 196 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I was one of those people that said “let’s see if they will be acceptable neighbors” and well, it seems we have an answer.

If it’s true then I now favor defederation.

Edit: it sounds like this wasn’t true.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 91 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I mean who could've seen something like this coming?

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 70 points 8 months ago

After so many positive experiences with the charming and wholesome company Meta, now this completely out of the blue...

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 59 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s not just true, there’s a history of this mentioned in the replies to the original masto comment. Pixelfed is a direct competitor/alternative to instagram and meta’s has a pretty clear policy of not giving it any airtime on their platforms.

Why, well they dominate the instagram style platform space (and I’d guess it’s their biggest platform ATM and most prospective going forward). Twitter-style platforms are new for them and introduce monopoly issues … so they toy with the fediverse to allay potential issues.

I think all of the schmoozing the likes of Evan, Gargron etc are doing with meta (they have active accounts on Threads AFAIU, for instance) will reveal their true colours (techbro growth mindset just the hipster way) and leave them with egg on their face.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

For sure they saw dollar signs down to road for them when Meta decided to create threads.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago

I was one of those people that said “let’s see if they will be acceptable neighbors”

Despite how it may sound, I mean this in a non-snarky way. Are you aware of their history as a company?

[+] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

how Dare that remote instance moderate the content coming into them. hole shit, lets shut down all instances that do that!

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If there are any instances or comms that don't let you mention alternatives, then yes definitely shut them down

[+] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

so fediverse instances must adhere to some global moderation, or else? sounds an awful lot like a walled garden.

you sound exactly like what you hate

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

One of the cool things about the fediverse is that you are free to run your own instance with whatever rules you do or don't want, and tell the rest of us to fuck right off.

Some instances will defederate from you depending on what those rules are, like those specific relatives we all avoid if we can at holidays, and ignore the rest of the year. They are also free to do so.

IOW, folks might tell your instance (or Meta's) to fuck right off.

That's what freedom looks like. It's not supposed to be just your freedom, it's supposed to be everyone's freedom.

Edit: And by the way, I'm very surprised if a company scrubbing mentions of competitors from its platform isn't a solid anti-trust violation.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

exactly! each instance can do its own thing. so its very strange to see people shitting on meta for doing exactly that.

federate/defederate i dont care, but this hate-boner everyone gets from the idea of meta on the 'verse is childish.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

each instance can do its own thing. so its very strange to see people shitting on meta for doing exactly that.

You mean scrubbing mentions of a competitor from their platform? That's not OK, and it's an indicator of their future behavior that is very consistent with their past behavior.

this hate-boner everyone gets from the idea of meta on the 'verse is childish.

You are entitled to your opinion. (And so are the folks you think are being childish.)

[–] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Nobody is saying to shut down any instance, only that we, and others on the platform who think likewise, would like to not have to see those instances. Nobody is saying to shut down Truth Social or Pawoo or Baraag, for instance, despite having severe disagreements with those instances - we just decided, on our instances, not to federated with them. You aren't obligated to agree with us - you can make your own instance with your own rules, as others have said, or switch to an instance accommodating to your beliefs. But at the same time, it doesn't mean the rest of us have to listen. Think of defederation like blocking - I'm sure you have some sort of block list for trolls, spammers and bots. Same thing, but for an instance.