this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
42 points (83.9% liked)

worldnews

3631 readers
17 users here now

Welcome!

We strive for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!


Rules:


Rule 1: No Further Gaza/Israel war posts

Rule 2: No US internal news/US politics

Rule 3: Editorials, opinions, analysis, blogs, gifs, memes, etc non-serious news sources

Rule 4: Non-English articles require a translation in the post or comments (mark the title with the source language eg. [FR] for French)

Rule 5: Petitions, advocacy, surveys

Rule 6: All-caps titles

Rule 7: Old news (≥ 1-Month-old) articles

Rule 8: Unlabeled NSFW images/videos

Rule 9: URL shorteners

Thank you.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thatguy_ie@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In other words "nobody wants to buy the grain I stole from Ukraine".

[–] mothringer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Even worse, the sanctions don't even apply to grain exports.

[–] Arael15th@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As much as I think Russia is a hellish pit that radiates evil, even I recognize that the intentionally fragile global economy requires Russian grain to flow freely if we don't want half of Africa (and probably part of Douth America) straight up federating with Russia.

[–] mothringer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, which is why the sanctions don't apply to grain exports...

[–] Arael15th@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, I'm saying that I hold my nose and agree with the sanctions not applying to grain exports

[–] h3rm17@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

But they sure have made it harder to export it and transport it.