this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
164 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

74067 readers
3856 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
164
Why The New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Why The New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI::The AI community needs to take copyright lawsuits seriously.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It didn’t produce the algorithm logically, it copied it.

The magic number is part of the logic of the thing.

But yes as said copilot is overfitted. Inverse sqrt still isn't a good example, it's nearly as bad as Oracle trying to claim to have found copyright infringement in Android's standard Java library by saying that Math.average or whatnot is identical. There are way better examples of why copilot is fucked up.