242
submitted 9 months ago by ardi60@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago

To me it’s a sign of how out of whack the stock market is right now. Lemmy created the Reddit experience at a fraction of the cost. Yet Reddit spends millions a year doing it.

[-] infinitepcg@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

The difficult thing is gaining users, not writing the code.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

Considering a large majority are bots, I don't think that is their issue. Until their numbers are public, we won't be able to see the acquisition cost.

[-] infinitepcg@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think the number of bots matters much, there are much more real people on Twitter than on Mastodon. It's not an issue for Twitter because they already are the platform where everyone else is. I'm optimistic about Mastodon, it already has the better UX and the better business model and I think it will slowly attract more users over time and eventually reach the relevance that Twitter had at its peak.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

and twitter wasn't worth 44 billion dollars. They also were not profitable.

Reddit is not worth 5 billion dollars. A few years ago they claimed 10 billion.

People need to stop assigning such high valuations as this is what creates billionaires when the value isn't there.

[-] infinitepcg@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's hard to tell how much a platform is worth, arguably the value of Twitter was 44B, since someone was willing to pay that.

The good news is, if you're really certain that Reddit is overvalued, you'll soon be able to short it and get rich if you end up being right!

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

I don’t short stocks. I invest in companies I believe in and that provide value. That’s why I won’t invest in Reddit. I don’t believe in the company or the people running it. I have a few odd ball stocks like Google that I don’t believe in but overall they treat their employees well and they have a plan for success. I’m a big fan of their 5% policy. I just overall don’t like their model.

[-] infinitepcg@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I think it's reasonable to not short stocks. I just find it a bit weird to see people confidently proclaim that a company is overvalued, but than not shorting the stock, which would be the rational thing to do.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

It’s gambling and not investing. If I thought it was valued properly, I’d invest in the company. I don’t as such I won’t invest in the company.

I don’t gamble with my money. I invest in companies long term

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
242 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

34878 readers
24 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS