this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
301 points (75.7% liked)

Technology

74643 readers
2496 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just put the device on a separate wifi without internet access, or look at the "child protection" features of your router. Ours can put devices based on their MAC into "access groups" which range from "full access" over "internet from \ to " to "no internet at all".

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The article mentions that his router is probably to blame.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kind of wild we're getting to the point where various pieces of equipment, with hardware we don't want to use, need to be tricked into connecting to a fake network in order to prevent themselves from publishing their credentials.

And that's if we assume there aren't open Wi-Fi networks they won't connect to automatically, in order to do their dirty deeds undeterred by their pesky owners.

[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Luckily, most embedded devices lack the smart to attach to two networks at the same time. So you keep it locked into a network where it can only do your bidding, and it won't listen to anyone else. Unless they built in some very crazy and nefarious code and drive around with network enabled cars in the owners neighborhood.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

puts on tin foil hat

https://www.wired.com/2012/05/google-wifi-fcc-investigation/

Wait, I don't need a tin foil hat for this... It was national news

At the point it becomes impossible to buy hardware that doesn't have a Wi-Fi antenna in it, I'll get really worried regardless. Tricking a device into connecting to the right wifi network already is so wild, and people shouldn't have to do that. I'm smart enough to. Not everybody is. Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

No need for an extra router. I just put those device into the "has no internet access" group. It is one of those "Parental Control" things. Every device inside the net can see and talk to it, but itself cannot talk to anything outside.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which is understandable... To me, anyway. Until the router needs to be reset, or something else happens to it.

Come to think of it, I'm not sure if my router hardware actually supports this possibility. I've got a PiHole, but I'm also not the average person I play telephone tech support for.

[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Until the router needs to be reset, or something else happens to it.

That's what "configuration backups" are for. You've got some, don't you?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Who, me? I never thought about it before because I like to live dangerously