191
What is your machine naming scheme? (startrek.website)
submitted 1 year ago by aquova@startrek.website to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
315 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've ended up with a number of machines on my network, and a need to name them all in a somewhat logical way. For several years I had them named after the planets, which worked well until the PCs for myself, my girlfriend, servers and Raspberry Pi's quickly summed up to more than the eight planets. I've broadened it somewhat to include any Greek/Roman mythological figure, but the system is definitely not as clean as it used to be.

Do you have a coordinated naming theme for your machines?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

The fifth time you get a ticket saying something like ‘Hedwig is down’

If only there was an excellent database to store where Hedwig.bthl4.sea.wa.goliath.corp was and maybe include an alias so you know it's NNTP5.goliath.corp also.

I shall invent one. It shall replicated and synchronize quickly. It shall interface and accept changes and share data. It will be simple to query so everyone can use it. I shall call it DNS . If people get snippy, I shall next invent an HS record.

Learn to use the tools, man. It'll help you adhere to a 40-year-old RFC on naming things.

[-] iMeddles@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, if you've built the network from scratch that works. Retrofitting it into an existing network however is a massive piece of work when you don't have that single source of truth to start with however. On networks I've built sensibly, I'll happily give people whatever CNAME they want to refer to their machine, but the machines actual name is descriptive, not the other way round.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 6 points 1 year ago

I am 100% with you on this. At work the name should instantly tell me everything I need to know about the system at a glance.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Rfc1178 be damned.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 4 points 1 year ago

I'll get right on rearchitecting the dns infrastructure of a large sprawling corporation, with mountains of technical debt from decades of acquisitions where they just mashed shit together. I'm sure that project will get approved.

Don't be condescending, man.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Well I'm glad you know it's there!

I can't comment on your particular technical debt, as I'm not very psychic. I like how you say not to be condescending and require me to be psychic. That's cool, but I bet you're stressed.

Have a good week.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
191 points (97.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40384 readers
117 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz