this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1381 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

60970 readers
441 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/494473

Compared against the predominant incumbent social media platforms, the fediverse is very small.

information sources:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why bluesky and threads should embrace ActivityPub.

Social media is splintering - accelerated by the fall of Twitter. It's not 2010 and a social media network is never going to be what twitter was in 2010. They'll might as well develop social media that can talk to other networks

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bluesky are never going to embrace ActivityPub... They've got their own separate federation protocol.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Bride protocols?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, but I'm hoping they'll ever find a way to bridge both or change their mind.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Their protocol (called the "Authenticated Transfer Protocol" or "AT Protocol" for short) fixes some issues that ActivityPub has.

For example, you can use your own domain name as your handle, even if you're not hosting the server yourself. This makes your username portable - you can move to a different server but keep the same username. You just need to update some DNS records. It's not possible to move server but keep the same username with ActivityPub, since your username is always at the server's domain name.

What I'm hoping is that the developers of ActivityPub take some ideas onboard, but it'll be hard given the current design of the protocol. Maybe we'll get a new version of ActivityPub one day.