this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
392 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59562 readers
1717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
392
‘Nudify’ Apps That Use AI to ‘Undress’ Women in Photos Are Soaring in Popularity (time.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
231 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

‘Nudify’ Apps That Use AI to ‘Undress’ Women in Photos Are Soaring in Popularity::It’s part of a worrying trend of non-consensual “deepfake” pornography being developed and distributed because of advances in artificial intelligence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Nudity shouldn't be considered sexual.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not all nudity is but there is no non-sexual reason to use AI to undress someone without consent

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The question on consent is something I'm trying to figure out. Do you need consent to alter an image that is available in a public space? What if it was you who took the picture of someone in public?

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Keep in mind there is a difference between ethical and legal standards. Legally you may not need consent to alter a photo of someone unless it was a copyrighted work possibly. But ethically it definitely requires consent, especially in this context

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

The difference between legal and ethical is one could get you fined or imprisoned and the other would make a group of people not like you.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Just because something shouldn't be doesn't mean It won't be. This is reality and we can't just wish something to be true. You saying it doesn't really help anything.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Whoooooosh.

In societies that have a healthy relationship with the human body, nudity is not considered sexual. I'm not just making up fantasy scenarios.

[–] mossy_@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

so because it's not a problem in your culture it's not a problem?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're just really looking for an excuse to attack someone, aren't you?

[–] mossy_@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

You caught me, I'm an evil villain who preys on innocent lemmings for no reason at all

[–] criticalthreshold@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Pipe dream.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Take it up with God or evolution then

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can't really be that stupid.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml -2 points 11 months ago

Who hurt you?