this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
888 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2866 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless you're arguing that any use of data from the Internet counts as "fair use" and therefore is excepted under copyright law, what you're saying makes no sense.

There may be an argument that some of the ways ChatGPT uses data could count as fair use. OTOH, when it's spitting out its training material 1:1, that makes it pretty clear it's copyright infringement.

[–] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In reality, what you're saying makes no sense.

Making something available on the internet means giving permission to download it. Exceptions may be if it happens accidentally or if the uploader does not have the necessary permissions. If users had to make sure that everything was correct, they'd basically have to get a written permission via the post before visiting any page.

Fair use is a defense against copyright infringement under US law. Using the web is rarely fair use because there is no copyright infringement. When training data is regurgitated, that is mostly fair use. If the data is public domain/out of copyright, then it is not.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Making something available on the internet means giving permission to download it.

Literally and explicitly untrue.

[–] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, you can put something up and explicitly deny permission to visit the link. But courts rarely back up that kind of silliness.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In reality, what you're saying makes no sense.

Making something available on the internet means giving permission to download it. Exceptions may be if it happens accidentally or if the uploader does not have the necessary permissions.

In reality the exceptions are way more widespread than you believe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act#Criticism

[–] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh. I see. The attempts to extract training data from ChatGPT may be criminal under the CFAA. Not a happy thought.

I did say "making available" to exclude "hacking".

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

The point I'm illustrating is that plenty of things reasonable people would assume are fine the law can call hacking.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Making something available on the internet means giving permission to download it.

No permission is given to download it. In particular, no permission is given to copy it.

Fair use is a defense against copyright infringement under US law

Yes, but it's often unclear what constitutes fair use.

Using the web is rarely fair use because there is no copyright infringement

What are you even talking about.

When training data is regurgitated, that is mostly fair use

You have no idea what fair use is, just admit it.