3204
If you value privacy, ditch Chrome and switch to Firefox now
(www.fastcompany.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
3204 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
57932 readers
2849 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
There's also Librewolf, based on Firefox. Comes with many (but could be better) privacy related settings available in firefox.
From the website:
Available for Linux, macOs, and Windows.
https://librewolf.net
The default settings of librewolf would drive the average user crazy. I'm not a fan of Firefox and use Librewolf myself but Firefox has sensible defaults for an average user that would be a net positive coming from Chrome. Just an FYI thinking of making the switch.
For additional context of those curious, Librewolf is very hardened by default. When you close your browser all site data is wiped (this can be turned off). Most people don't mess with their browser settings though... there's also a lot of little things that are disabled by default that will make people think the browser is broken e.g. canvas requests are silently denied by default, it's just not realistic for most people to use librewolf.
The average user is the greatest weak point in their security. Don't be the average user.
You are not wrong. This is a suggestion for slightly more advanced users that are into privacy. I do think it could be hardened more. I wonder why all permissions are not blocked by default.
At least I didn't suggest Lynx.
Oh yeah, not meaning to hate on your suggestion, just giving a fair warning to those who are looking to take the plunge. I consider myself advanced and librewolf drove me crazy for a few days but stuck with it and found a balance of settings that I like.
I appologize if I came across negative in any way and, I am certain, I did not feel any negativity from you. Your warnings are absolutely valid and needed to be brought up. I think, in the back of my head I thought that most users on lemmy are slightly more tech savvy than the average user.
Glad you stuck with it! I love it.
No apologies needed! Cheers!
I've been using it as my full-time browser for a year. I can't think of any time I've needed to use a different browser, but I don't ask a lot of my browser and I don't consume hostile commercial media.
Years ago I was forced to use Internet Explorer to access employee services. I had a mental stroke every time I had to use it. Not anymore. Librewolf just works, but I also don't visit all the crazy pants wackadoo websites.
I've just heard about librewolf in this developing thread, but I've no idea what sets it apart from Firefox. What does it do that Firefox doesn't?
Edit: your link says it focuses on the same thing Firefox does, to my knowledge, so I'm wondering if there's something Firefox neglects? Or is it just to keep the field diverse? Which is also good.
Hello!
It is based on Firefox, which means it is Firefox with some customizations. There are certain settings in Firefox that some would consider intrusive to privacy. For example, Firefox by default runs studies and collects anonymous data. While it is anonymous, some people just don't like that. I don't really know what they collect so I want to opt out. In Librewolf, this setting is turned off by default. The pocket is disabled in Librewolf. I know Firefox is free and I am glad that it exists, but I feel like it's becoming a bloated Android version for Samsung phones with apps that you cannot remove and that just take up space for no reason.
Does this make sense? Am I somewhat explaining?
Yes, that helps quite a bit! Thank you!
I don't really like the Pocket feature, either. It's nice to know there's a version without that.