275
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
275 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
59200 readers
2814 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Could this technology be used to harness some power from lightning strikes down the road? I don't know what the power requirements are of the lasers, but I know that lightning has a lot. If there was a way to direct that to some sort of collection facility, that would be pretty neat. Bonus points if there was a way to promote conditions for lightning strikes in the first place.
Would be pretty cool to harness that. An average lightning strike is around five gigajoules. That would be enough to power a typical home for three months. Problem is there's no way to store that much energy that quickly. It's like a hundred thousand Amps at at a hundred million Volts for a fraction of a second. The physics makes a storage medium very difficult if not impossible to engineer. Though if it were possible, you could harness lighting on demand, would be a perfectly planet friendly power source.
It should not be stored in a battery if they do this. Atleast not a traditional one. Perhaps if they can manage the batteries based on heat trapped in sand it'd be cool. Or if they use it to break h2o bonds. something of that sort.
The problem with a battery is there's no known technology that can accept that much energy that quickly. Five gigajoules is a lot of energy, it would be a massive battery and would have to accept a full charge in a tiny fraction of a second.
It might be possible with a capacitor array. At a hundred megavolts a capacitor array would not have to be terribly large to store five gigajoules. The initial problem is insulation. With that kind of voltage everything would have to be housed in a vacuum since any exposure or contact could provide a path to ground. Then there's the amperage the capacitor has to handle in charging. A hundred thousand Amps over any conventional conductor is going to vaporize it. Maybe super conductors could be employed.
Say you get past those challenges and you have a capacitor array storing charge at a hundred megavolts. You have to convert it to useable voltage somehow. You need a step down converter that can handle voltage that high. Now you have a whole new set of electrical engineering obstacles.
It might be feasible without sci-fi technology, but then would it be worth the development and deployment cost.
In theory yes but it wouldn’t be a very reliable source of energy, it might be viable if there were batteries to charge that could then be released into the grid however
Sure. I suppose battery technology probably has to jump quite a bit before that would be feasible, amongst what I assume are many other issues.
Yup! There’s a few hurdles but it’ll get there!
Storage would be key, since we have some great locations in the world to build collectors.
For example around Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela, it has a geography which means there is a lightning season which can cause 150 days straight with up 9 hours of lightning every day/night and 20-40 strikes per minute at a concentration of ~250 per square km.