1
submitted 1 year ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

As Watling himself puts it: “Unhardened UAVs are disposable tools like munitions and get consumed very rapidly. You need them in your force and you need them to be cheap.”

For decades, Western armies have relied on a few expensive, 'exquisite' high-tech platforms, and that includes drones. This conflict of disposable drones may lead to a radical change in military procurement towards the many and the cheap.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mysticaldeknoi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

“…even if the figure really is 10,000, this appears sustainable…10,000 DJI quadcopters at an average cost of about $1,000 would be $10m. Last week, Russia lost an Su-34 bomber, with a sticker price of something over $40m…

“And yesterday Russia apparently lost an even more advanced Su-35, which goes for around $85m. Together these two aircraft alone represent a loss ten times as great as all Ukraine’s drones for the month put together.“

The headline is pretty much clickbait. $10m is a drop in the bucket.

[-] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Great breakdown, very enlightening

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah! I thought it was interesting that it's not a big deal.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8260 readers
569 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS