this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1170 points (96.4% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4282 readers
16 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Apytele@sh.itjust.works
ethaver@kbin.earth
1170
What’s in a name? (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 year ago by NotSpez@lemm.ee to c/curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works
142 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because:

There is no sensible phylogenetic definition of “fish” which includes both trout and sharks but not humans.

Gills.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll be just as terse

phylogenetic

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I admit I don't really know much about that. But Wikipedia says:

In biology, phylogenetics (/ˌfaɪloʊdʒəˈnɛtɪks, -lə-/)[1][2][3] is the study of the evolutionary history and relationships among or within groups of organisms. These relationships are determined by phylogenetic inference methods that focus on observed heritable traits, such as DNA sequences, protein amino acid sequences, or morphology.

Where morphology is:

Morphology is a branch of biology dealing with the study of the form and structure of organisms and their specific structural features.[1]

This includes aspects of the outward appearance (shape, structure, colour, pattern, size), i.e. external morphology (or eidonomy), as well as the form and structure of the internal parts like bones and organs

It sure seems to me like that should cover gills.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, fish would be a morphology that includes gills, fins, streamlined body shape for swimming, etc. But there is no good phylogenetic definition because all the animals we call "fish" do not form a monophyletic group. The monophyletic group encompassing all fish would include also mammals, reptiles including birds, and amphibians because these all have fish ancestors

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But there is no good phylogenetic definition because all the animals we call “fish”

The challenge was to come up with a group "which includes both trout and sharks but not humans". It seems like "gills" satisfies that pretty well.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Animals with gills do not form a monophyletic group.