this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
834 points (97.2% liked)

> Greentext

7581 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was also the result of inexperienced actors.

In the OT the actors would regularly be like "I don't think this line sounds good let's with this instead"

But in the PT everyone just went along with everything due to lack of experience and not wanting to be hard to work with/think they're better than the director

[–] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just about the opposite of the relative experience of the actors involved in both trilogies.

The original trilogy was filled with almost completely inexperienced actors. The prequels were mostly cast with experienced performers, excepting the child actors of course.

The real difference is that Lucas didn't actually direct most of the original trilogy in the first place.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've always heard the opposite but I could be wrong.

[–] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, George Lucas hired Harrison Ford as a carpenter because he wasn't interested in doing a second movie after American Graffiti.

Mark Hamill was probably the most experienced member of the original cast because he had done some TV work.

Natalie Portman had starred in four features before Star Wars and McGregor had done more than ten.

[–] Paradox 2 points 1 year ago

Peter Cushing was hardly inexperienced

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think Mark Hamill has mentioned before that there were times when Harrison Ford pushed back against Lucas that Han Solo would never say the lines he was given, and got them changed as a result.