this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

10459 readers
49 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


πŸ“† F1 Calendar
🏁 FIA Documents
πŸ“Š F1 Pace


2025 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ Mexico 24-26 Oct
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Brazil 07-09 Nov
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 20-22 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 28-30 Nov
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 05-07 Dec

Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
  8. No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have never seen one of these interviews that convinces me Andretti wouldn't be good for the sport.

Especially with recent history.

[–] WatTyler@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

James Vowles came closest to convincing me that a new team could really harm the back-half of the grid. I'm still in favour of the Andretti bid but I think teams like Williams should still be permitted more spending on infrastructure to bridge the gap between them and the bigger teams.

But even then! The 200 million fee that the new team has to give is literally to reduce the impact of the prize pot dilution. It was cleverly left out of James Vowles statement.