this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
78 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

63782 readers
436 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
78
How do you isolate a printer in your homelab? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 3 days ago by rearview@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi all, I've gotten a Brother machine (DCP series) that can do wifi printing/scanning over their proprietary app. However, I'd like to lock it down from my network, because having it on the same LAN as my other devices and the ability to phone out to the internet seem like room for mischievious activities.

For context, I have OpenWRT on my router, and my clients can access the Brother using their iPrint&Scan app and AirPrint on wifi, as well as the traditional USB port. But I'm not good in networking. In my research, I drafted out the following solutions:

  1. Create a firewall rule to block the printer itself from making outbound requests. Seems simple, but I'm not sure if this can persist after IP changes or not.
  2. Create a VLAN for "IoT devices" that cannot send outbound requests to my normal VLAN nor the internet. Inspiration from this video, I'd need to manage a new SSID but it may come in handy for more IoT devices later.
  3. Hook the Brother up to a Raspberry Pi via USB, and install CUPS + SANE on the Pi. Assuming the Pi cannot "phone home" on behalf of the printer, this makes it a local-only "print+scan service" on my normal network and doesn't require an extra VLAN.

I'd like to ask: which solution above is best for "neutering" the Brother? Or are there any alternatives/details I might've missed? I'm not sure if blocking outbound requests this way is enough of a security hardening for an untrusted device, and if there are any usability issues I've overlooked so far.

Thanks for any advice, and please share any printer/scanner setup you have in your networks as well. So hopefully I can get more inspiration!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

New printers can be okay. I don't know of any specific problems with new printers except those ones with the ink subscription services. I'm saying my printer is old because it's from another time. The only reason you'd isolate your networked printer in 2005 would be if you didn't want other people to access your printer. Devices in your home automatically, deliberately making themselves worse on command from a cloud service was not a thing. The biggest danger with devices this old is that they probably have unpatched security vulnerabilities exploitable by anything else that gets on your network.

I have a VR headset from Facebook that is on its own VLAN because it defaults to randomizing its MAC address by default and this allowed it to bypass the firewall, phone home, and nonconsensually install new anti-features after being blocked because the setting got reset back to random when changing something. Recent LG TVs and other devices with worse preinstalled malware have been known to make requests to other devices on your network, but I've never heard of them using those other devices to get around network restrictions, at least not directly.

[โ€“] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have a VR headset from Facebook that is on its own VLAN because it defaults to randomizing its MAC address by default and this allowed it to bypass the firewall, phone home, and nonconsensually install new anti-features after being blocked because the setting got reset back to random when changing something.

That is infuriating and I'd do the same.

Plenty of reports of devices like LG TVs acting as gateways to external devices and LG in particular seems to be a privacy nightmare. I bought a couple of appliances that advertised their smart features only to find LG's app was required. That app actually required both Internet access AND my exact location at all times to function at all! I shut it all down and disconnected everything from wifi.

You may be right to be concerned even about printers though. At some point we're going to be reading about some built-in AI hacking other network devices for Internet access and transmitting our private information to the world.