this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2026
30 points (94.1% liked)

Heathcliff

410 readers
33 users here now

A place for Heathcliff comics and their edits.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah… again the cat adds nothing.

Starting to understand why heathcliff without heathcliff exists

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The cat adds an audience, otherwise Iggy is just talking to himself, which for some reason seems frowned upon in newspaper comics.

But notice that for these two, their roles are minimized to the max. One allows the cartoonist to voice his gag line, the other to be the audience, but that's it. Their arms are eliminated, and Heathcliff doesn't even get a face so as to potentially react. This is a major change from the days of original cartoonist Gately, who usually portrayed the cat as highly expressive.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for the in depth context. I appreciate it and wouldn’t have noticed that reduction in quality

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Sure thing. And I'd say it's mostly down to a change in philosophy, with the strip moving from a more traditional character / gag-based comic in to a pretty unique, absurd direction, sometimes even surreal. For example, check out these from fairly early in Gallagher's career, when he was doing a very good job capturing Gately's original style:


https://heathcliff-images.storage.googleapis.com/heathcliff/2003-10-17.png


https://heathcliff-images.storage.googleapis.com/heathcliff/2003-10-16.png


https://heathcliff-images.storage.googleapis.com/heathcliff/2003-10-15.png

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Wild. Those are definitely different. Surprising to see those are only from 2003. It definitely has a more classic look to it

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I think you got it.