this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
194 points (88.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

44187 readers
383 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] keylemmypie@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago

This is an extreme oversimplification, and a literal interpretation of obviously symbolic and allegorical texts.

Just like ‘giants’ doesn’t refer to literal giant people, ‘relationship with God’ can mean several dozen different things, depending on the context.

Allegories and symbols are very common in religious texts. To treat them literally misses the point.

Which texts? I'm going to disagree with most examples, so please give examples so we can hash it out. "Obviously symbolic and allegorical" is going to depends heavily on the plausibility structure you start with before reading them, I'd like to see evidence for that statement.

These texts also tend to repeat the same points multiple times, or overwrite them altogether (countless occurrences in the Bible), with broader context in entirely different sections of the texts, if at all present.

More examples please.

Annotations usually help with this, but it depends on the translation and version of the Bible you’re reading.

What do you mean by annotations? Comparing various translations can help to get a better understanding of the original text, I don't take a single translation as the only correct one.