United Kingdom

6975 readers

424 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

BBC to force more to pay licence fee with ‘YouTube tax’ (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 2 days ago by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Currently, anyone who uses a television to watch content must pay the licence fee even if they do not watch the BBC. Under the proposed changes it would be expanded to cover all other online providers, such as Netflix, Amazon, Disney+, YouTube, which are currently exempt.

The Whitehall source explained that the move was “because people are able to use them to avoid paying currently”. They added: “It’s not fair that people are essentially able to watch television content but avoid the licence fee.”

Why would the BBC be allowed to collect money on services it does not provide? This is basically saying "everyone must pay this fee, or unplug their internet".

At that point, you might as well just take it from the government budget.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why would the BBC be allowed to collect money on services it does not provide? This is basically saying "everyone must pay this fee, or unplug their internet".

I think that it's because the BBC puts content on YouTube (and I assume either doesn't have ads enabled or wants more money than they generate).

I guess I could understand someone saying "well, with TV, I have to watch British broadcast or cable stations, and with YouTube, I don't, but I'd think that the same would apply to TVs using satellite receivers, and I assume—though I don't know, don't live in the UK—that satellite TV users are also subject to the license fee.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More fool them if they don't have ads on their own content

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are prohibited from running advertising on any BBC-branded service within the UK.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which is fine for the UK pop but a YouTube channel can reach the whole world. The ad revenue must be high for those channels.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Not really. They oay a very low rate