this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
366 points (90.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

43995 readers
407 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VeryVito@lemmy.world 162 points 3 days ago (41 children)

No technology has ever resulted in lighter workloads for the average person. Different, and sometimes less strenuous, but never less time consuming.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 46 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Washing machine.

Also, lighter work loads and less time consuming are different arguments - unless you mean no technology has ever resulted in neither, which is a rather bold statement.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 44 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Counterpoint: The cotton gin. It was supposed to make slavery obsolete, but actually reinvigorated the practice of slavery by making slaves able to do more work.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Before washing machines, people would hand off washing to professionals. Now the expectation is that the person who can afford it must wash things themselves. More time spent on that.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Before washing machines, people would hand off washing to professionals.

Uh, maybe for rich people...

Let me introduce you to the washboard and the bucket.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The professionals, who obviously could wash clothes just by staring at them.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Quite the jutsu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure every piece of technology past the wheel can be considered to save humans time with their tasks.

[–] the_q@piefed.social 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No the tasks increase to fill the saved time.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Better technology frees more time for other tasks. Whether that's work or leisure depends on the individual. Everyone has the same 24 hours a day independent of how you use them. Most people don't just sit and do nothing. To even suggest that things like an electric stove, washing machine, lawnmower or a bicycle aren't saving people real time on tasks they'd have to do either way is ridiculous.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seems like we still must work the same amount regardless of how much we'd "like" to do other things though. What you're talking about happened, but happened a long time ago.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

In most cases people get paid by the hour. The wage is compensation for your time, not effort. If a new technology comes along that increases your work productivity you'll still end up working the same hours because that's what you're being paid for. I'd say that there's still a real difference between spending 8 hours a day swinging an axe compared to running a chainsaw. Same amount of time is spent working but the effort needed goes down while productivity increases.

However, this isn't always the case. I work in construction and it's not untypical that someone has a fixed price for completing a job. There you are not compensated for your time per se but effort. If you're quick you do get to "go home early." However this doesn't lead to people working less either - quite the opposite. They get greedy, hoard too much work, rush it, the quality suffers and they tend to get really stressed out and easily irritated.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In olden times before washing machines people were expected to change into clean (washed) underclothes daily, and an apron got washed when dirty, but their main clothing went a long time between cleanings. Even longer than the clothes on the chair, like months.

Similarly, expectations of manicured pool-table lawns with the advent of lawnmowers.

Better stoves/ovens I'll totally grant you. I have enough trouble adjusting from my old "runs hot" oven to my new "runs cold" oven, I can't imagine trying to bake a cake in a wood or coal oven.

And the horse that preceded the bicycle took more maintenance, not less.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Why constantly add more tasks? There’s only finite amount of maintenance on a house or things that need to get done.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

human innovativeness ensures there's always new things that people want to do.

[–] the_q@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought we were talking about capitalism. I misread the comments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Dish washer, laundry washer, laundry drier, lawn mower, a vehicle, there’s thousands dude.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All things that save time at home, not at work.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

Do people not do laundry for work? Mow lawns? Drive? Anything you could use for personal use can also help with work… what about a restaurant? No washing machines there apparently….

Do you have any specific examples that are solely “home saving” pieces of technology? Or do other peoples jobs not exist past your desk?

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is a good point, and it's often much longer workhours. People used to have to stop when it got dark, because candles and oil lamps were too expensive, but not with electric lights. Mules refuse to work more than about six hours a day, but trucks will keep going as long as you refuel them.

[–] weps@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

not even a neo-luddite. a good old fashioned luddite

load more comments (36 replies)