this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
378 points (99.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

28152 readers
477 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Different angles:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Yes, I had to fight my own pedantry to post that phrasing! It's one piece, but calling it two pieces connected by a handle is the only way I could think of to describe it and actually be understood. I challenge you to come up with a title for this which is both easy to understand and topologically accurate.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Two shards held together by the handle to form one piece

[–] Val@anarchist.nexus 2 points 9 hours ago

If you consider a mug to consist of two parts, the handle and the cup, the cup has broken into pieces and the handle is holding two of them together. So I think "two pieces held together by the handle" is the most correct way to describe it.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

but calling it two pieces connected by a handle is the only way I could think of to describe it and actually be understood

Yes completely fair! I'm actually not sure about what would count as a separate "piece" with glassware and ceramics. There's probably a mereological argument for why its one or the other

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 15 hours ago

Never heard that word before. Wikipedia: "Mereology is the philosophical study of part-whole relationships." Fascinating that there's a name for that!

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

Would you settle for

"OH SHIT...damnit. oh wait a minute..."