this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
587 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
88590 readers
3472 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The funny part is if you could buy fake IDs then technically it was a crime to tell them where the flea market was.
Knowing where to commit a crime is not illegal.
Aiding and abetting is though my dude.
Telling someone how to do a thing isn't aiding and abetting.
If I tell you that you can kill someone by shoving them off the Brooklyn Bridge, I'm not potentially taking part in a homicide.
Actually based on how the law is written, yes you are. And also what you're saying is irrelevant because telling someone "hey go here to buy a fake ID" is absolutely aiding and abetting.
Aiding an abetting requires participation in the crime or encouragement to commit the crime to some extent. Simply saying how a crime can be committed is not aiding and abetting.
It's very similar (and in some cases exactly the same) as being an accessory to a crime.
If the Brady Foundation says that people are 3D printing lower receivers using design files from a specific fosscad site to create ghost guns, then someone does that in California, the Brady Foundation isn't "aiding and abetting."
The accessory example of the above scenario would be directly telling someone exactly where and how to to get the specific parts and files they need and encouraging them to do so in a jurisdiction where it's illegal with the direct intent of having them commit a crime.
Since the files are legal many places, as are the materials, it's almost impossible to prove a specific intent to violate the law. It's similar with TPB. MEGA got taken down because they directly hosted the files and specifically encouraged people to illegally pirate software using the site. TPB has never done either.
I'm not sure why you keep using examples that aren't relevant to the thing were talking about but alright. Either way it was just a dumb joke. Have a good day!