Ottawa
News, events, discussions, and what not from Ottawa, Ontario.
Municipal website: https://ottawa.ca/
Rules
- Be polite and respectful.
- Please only post content relevant to the City of Ottawa or to its residents.
Ottawa on the Fediverse:
Ottawa chatrooms:
-
XMPP: empty
-
Telegram: https://t.me/chatottawa
-
Discord: https://discord.gg/TrCHrucmqJ
Please note the following:
* All chatrooms are linked together. If you join one room your messages will be copied to the other platforms.
* Matrix is an open source and potentially distributed chat protocol. The matrix room listed is hosted on matrix.org, a somewhat centralized hub for a lot of currently public rooms. Though the protocol itself is free, libre and open source, the deployment of the protocol resembles a centralized service. This may be fixed in the future with the deployment of independent servers.
* Be aware that both Telegram and Discord are centralized proprietary platforms and do not necessarily protect your rights nor privacy while simultaneously giving power to corporations.
view the rest of the comments
We really should start making our politicians sign legally binding contracts, instead of letting them "pledge" to do things they have no intention of doing.
Come up with a real plan, that actually works by the numbers, and sign a contract to get it done.
I don't see how that would be enforceable at any level, as I can't think of a plan that is without the need for external cooperation.
Municipal politics is especially challenging for an idea like this. Municipalities operate under rules the province sets. That's how they were able to remap wards and change the number of councillors in Toronto, for example. Strong Mayor powers are extremely limited, given to a few cities, and are designed to make it easier for cities to push forward the goals of the province despite local opposition.
Further, but more of a personal opinion, I don't think candidates (especially municipal, especially if not incumbent) know enough to make effective plans. It's one thing to view from the outside, but without access to the staff who have all the history and supporting documentation, it's just not realistic.
See, in order to actually do it, you rework the entire system top to bottom.
If politicians are in legally binding contracts, they won't be lying to all of us constantly.
The entire idea requires a completely different system than we have, with the existing system, they just lie with impunity, or were "wrong" about a subject they pushed, and see no negative effects of that at all. You or I do that at our jobs, and we're fired.
If you're suggesting that you simply cannot hold public officials to their word, because reasons that just isn't good enough. That's just acknowledging that we're letting them lie to the citizenry with no consequences at all.
If they're found to be corrupt, arrest and jail them. What we do now is abhorrent when it comes to the political class lying with impunity.
Respectfully, I think you are giving municipal politicians too much credit.
Do they promise things they have zero power to achieve? Yes, absolutely. I would like to see better understanding of how municipalities operate so that people can see through that. And to understand wording like "work towards" and "advance" and being super vague because he can't promise to actually do much.
I'm saying he's not actually promising much if anything, because he can't do much, if anything. I can be more specific, if you'd like. Here is his plan: https://marksutcliffe.ca/priorities/infrastructure I will focus on what he can do, not whether it's a good idea.
Promises that involve asking staff to look at things and make recommendations (that they might already be doing, I don't know Ottawa that well) or directing them to work with others:
(My popcorn is READY for this one.)
Promises that require others who he has no power over to agree to do
Promises that depend on things outside of his control, like availability of engineering and construction contractors, regulatory approvals, etc.
Promises to do with the budget, which he has a lot of power over but cannot unilaterally set (if 2/3 vote to override his veto he's SOL)
Promises he has a single vote towards, i.e. approving the award of contracts
Things that aren't promises, but statements of what is currently planned.
I hope this helps. I think the public needs to stop thinking of municipal politicians as people who can promise results and instead look to what they say they will prioritize and support.
That'll never fly. It should, but you'd need a politician to agree to that. Good luck.