this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
1021 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

88514 readers
3122 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

OK, maybe no cloud is a bit extreme, I'll grant that. Maybe your business needs some clunky, minimum-effort, rent-seeking SaaS crapware like Salesforce... fine

IaaS? No. Nope. Not for anything we actually need.

No cloud for anything required to manage and maintain the local network or user accounts. If the external network goes down, we're still operational internally, we have our own domain and authentication servers, everyone can still login and run any locally deployed applications (which we prefer, so most of our business needs are served that way). We're not going to lose corporate data to the latest AWS leak, we're not going to be dead in the water because AWS East went down again, we aren't going to have to reasess our budget because AWS raised their monthly fee again.

It's not about "feelings", it's about proper risk assessment and mitigation.

You can outsource labor, you can outsource storage, you can outsource compute, you can't outsource risk.