this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
1007 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

88390 readers
3533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 211 points 2 days ago (3 children)

US: Let's sanction everyone everywhere all at once!

Also US: Why don't people want to be dependent on US systems? 😭

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't undermine the country more if they tried, which makes one wonder.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yep. Trump's actions are no different than what any bad actor would do if they wanted to destroy the USA without invading it.

  • Destroy our soft power... check!
  • Turn allies against us... check!
  • Destroy our economy... check!
  • Drastically weaken our military... check!
[–] phx@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Destroying what (appearance of) democracy they had as well

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And I'm accepting that he does it because he's likely a Russian asset, but why the fuck are the rest of them playing along? You can't tell me they're all being bought.

[–] peathah@fedinsfw.app 10 points 1 day ago

They want corporate slaves, if the us is governed by the rich and corporations, corporate cities/islands they are trying to build are not needed anymore.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yea we got a bit of the β€œinmates are running the asylum” situation over here.

In the immortal words of the joker(paraphrased) this country needs an enema

[–] SillyMe@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

we would lose about a third of our human biomass

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish. Organizations and countries/municipalities are far too lazy to make the change.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The time and money involved are both staggering. This isn't about you switching operating systems on your personal laptop.

Where are you going to get support staff anytime soon? All those Windows admins magically switching to Linux overnight?

Hell, Linux offers nothing remotely comparable to the power of Active Directory. That alone will keep Windows in the lead.

And more. This isn't about lazy.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Time + motivation + money can overcome a lot of obstacles. It also helps that template of what is needed already exists in Active Directory. This changes the project from "innovating something new" to "a slightly better copy" and is usually a lot faster and easier.

All copyright/patents are also void because of the sanctions at least in practice.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What is the alternative to AD, and are there currently companies running that, big or small?

[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At this point, a lot of entities don't need AD because their entire workflow runs in a web browser, and practically any SSO provider will work.

That said, accessing actual computer resources can be managed with groups and ACLs. Perhaps not as elegantly or as well-integrated as AD is, but that's the price you pay.

Red hat IDM, aka freeipa.

Depending on what youre doing you absolutely don't need active directory.

Hell, a lot of orgs are just going entra anyway. If you're using SSO like that or okta or keycloak you likely don't need AD.

[–] brimlar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I replied elsewhere, but our org has just been so happy with Jumpcloud.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

I have worked in big company where linux and windows coexisted, but we were developers so maybe that's why (IT was very strict though).