The Boston Globe has just published a shockingly sober article about the nonexistent genocide supposedly targeting the transgender community.
In it, they cite a report I coauthored showing that the murder rate is actually lower for trans-identifying people than the general population. Our report was responding to the HRC's annual reports pushing the narrative that there is an ongoing "Epidemic of Violence" against the transgender community.
The reporter says he "offered the Human Rights Campaign's key researcher, the transgender woman Charleigh Flohr, or anyone else with the organization an opportunity to rebut the Manhattan Institute finding, but they didn't reply to me."
That's unsurprising because the HRC is engaging in fundraising propaganda. They don't care about the truth, only promoting the narrative.
Our report presenting the actual data is irrefutable. That's why they have nothing to say in response.
You can read our report summary in @CityJournal here:
๐ https://www.city-journal.org/article/human-rights-campaign-transgender-murders-white-supremacy
Or explore our comprehensive report here:
๐ https://dont-shoot-the-data.github.io/TCLEAR/
Read the Boston Globe article here:
๐ https://archive.ph/VqhlI
That's not how the burden shift argument works. Making demands to defend oneself creates the burden.
Anyways, why not? You seem to think there's a reason not to.
Aight, fair point, but if you can't understand the irony of posting Ai slop on "critical analysis" I genuinely can't help you. Surely you know that LLMs don't actually analyze anything, right? It's a glorified predictive text keyboard.
Why can't they analyze anything? A sufficiently advanced predictive text keyboard is indistinguishable from intelligence.
Indistinguishable from YOUR intelligence maybe.
Why do you think that's an insult, given the comment you replied to?