NonCredibleDefense
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Other communities you may be interested in
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !combatvideos@sh.itjust.works
- !militarymoe@ani.social
Banner made by u/Fertility18
view the rest of the comments
Lol, well I certainly prefer a feisty real human to Claude's obsequiousness, although I'm not entirely convinced you actually did but I'll argue with you whether generated by a human or a bot so it is neither here nor there.
Quote: "Accountability isn't separate from atrocities, it determines whether they stop or continue unabated" unquote
So from where I'm sitting the constraints on the Tangerine Tyrant seem to be trivial and of little consequence, the few times he's been legally reined in he's quickly found a workaround or just straight up ignored the courts, and sure as hell none of the other supposed checks and balances are doing anything to stop the US sliding into fascism. I'd love to see your proof that he's been held accountable for well, ANYTHING. Epstein files showing he's a pedo rapist, nothing happened, loses sexual assault case - still hasn't paid the bill, blah blah no accountability. Or do you mean accountability for the senior leadership ? Hegseth hasn't even been charged with murder of those Caribbean sailors let alone held accountable for it.
This accountability seems to be rather foggy and mirage like. Sure as hell the atrocities haven't stopped so bottom line your accountability thesis doesn't seem to be showing much in the way of results - I think we can dismiss that argument.
" We'll look at Minab, since that seems to be something you like to talk about."
Yes the massacre of children does upset me, does it not upset you ?
"The details about that came from inside the house... US goverment officials leaked that to PBS and Bloomberg."
Bullshit. Show me the proof. The details hit non US publications like Al Jazeera and the Guardian DAYS before PBS and Bloomberg published anything that suggested the US was culpable, and the US govt is still denying it to this day - they walked out of the UN rather than look at the pictures of the little kids they killed.
quote "Whether China is acting within its own borders or without, it's still a boot crushing humans, and fuck you if you think otherwise, honestly" unquote
Nice attempt to misrepresent me - do I need to copy in quotes of the MULTIPLE times I said China was also evil ?
False dichotomy.
My position is that China and the US are both evil, in slightly different ways around the edges I'll grant, but in broad strokes, a pox on both of them.
You've done nothing to present a case that the US is not evil, you've just done some arm wavy whataboutisms and misdirections to try and distract from the point.
USA and China both evil, evil fraternal twins.
EDIT just noticed an opportunity for you to try the weasel words on for size, so to be clear PBS and Bloomberg reported the school got hit in roughly the same timeframe as the rest, what they did NOT do is lead the reporting on who was responsible. There's a world of difference between reporting civilian casualties and admitting it was a US bomb that killed them. That accusation was levelled by the foreign press first. Not that it really matters. The US is busily removing the freedom of the press and consolidating them all under dictator friendly oligarchs anyway.